AI builders get you 80% of the way. The last 20% — the part that decides whether real users can actually use the thing — needs someone who reads the actual error instead of regenerating around it. That's the job I do.
I'm Parth Sharma, an independent developer. I work with founders and small teams who built something real in Lovable, Cursor, Bolt, v0 or Replit — and then hit the wall every AI build hits: it works in the preview and falls apart for real users.
The breakages are almost always the same shape: the database returns nothing because row-level security rejects every read, the login loops because the session is never restored, the deploy dies on a missing env var, the service key is sitting in the browser bundle for anyone to copy. AI can't see these, because they only show up outside its sandbox. A person who's fixed them before can.
So I keep the practice small and the method simple: look at the real thing, find the real cause, fix exactly that, and ship it.
Before any money changes hands, you get a real diagnosis of your actual app — the cause of each problem, ranked. It's yours to keep even if you take it to someone else. If I can't help, I'll tell you plainly.
No hourly meter, no scope creep, no surprise invoice. You know the number before I start, and it doesn't move unless the job does.
Nothing goes live on your name without you seeing it first. I work against a copy, show you the fix, and hand it over clean.
You'll never get a wall of jargon meant to make the problem sound scarier than it is. The report says what broke, why, and what I'd do — in words you can act on.
New practice, deliberately. I'd rather earn trust one honest diagnosis at a time than claim a wall of logos. Send me something broken and judge me on the diagnosis — that's the whole pitch.